Investment in cycling infrastructure = better public health says minister

Investment in cycling infrastructure = better public health says minister

Navigation:
Home » Campaigning

Greater investment in cycling infrastructure would have huge benefits for public health, says Health Minister.

Above: Reciprocal benefits: Investment in cycle lanes has been proved to bring great returns in terms of public health - the key message from Health Minister Ann Soubry at the latest Get Britain Cycling inquiry session.

A government minister today echoed British Cycling’s calls for more spending on cycling infrastructure, adding that it could lead to savings from the £5 billion per year cost of the NHS.

Greater investment in cycling infrastructure would have benefits for public health and could provide savings for the health service, Health Minister Anna Soubry told the Get Britain Cycling’ inquiry today.

"It was good to hear the Public Health Minister say so clearly that cycling was a healthy thing to do, and that public health benefits from cycling investment."

APPCG Co-Chair Julian Huppert MP

Soubry, who told the inquiry she loved cycling as a child and that her husband bought her a mountain bike for Christmas, described herself as ‘wildly enthusiastic’ about cycling and said that cycle training and cycling as a sport should be taught in schools: “I see no reason whatsoever that cycling shouldn't be part of sport in schools ... I distinctly remember doing my cycling proficiency and it's stayed with me for life." Soubry warned that the perceived risks of cycling are standing in the way of progress, adding that she didn’t let her own children out on the roads due to safety fears.

The Health Minister was the first government minister to speak at the Get Britain Cycling inquiry. When questioned about the lack of a joined up approach on cycling, Soubry said that she has worked with Transport Minister Norman Baker on cycling initiatives but admitted that Whitehall “needs to show leadership.” Other witnesses and panel members at the inquiry agreed and said that the key to getting Britain on bikes is true cross-departmental working. Dr Sarah Wollaston MP said: “We need the education department to work with health and transport as well if we want to form habits for a lifetime.” Lord Berkeley asked if the Department for Transport can incorporate health benefits as a marker used when appraising a transport scheme.

Summing up the third session, co-Chair of the All Party Parliamentary Cycling Group, Ian Austin MP, said:

“The issue that stood out for me today was the need to get departments working together both nationally and at local authority level. It’s obviously good news we’ve got a health minister who say she’s passionate about cycling but we need to make sure her enthusiasm is shared across government so that a cohesive plan can be worked up to get Britain cycling. Without this, we’ll continue to have a piecemeal approach. That sentiment needs to be shared across local authorities – we saw some great examples today of what can be achieved.”

  Other key points from this week's session  
 

CPRE’s Ralph Smyth echoed British Cycling’s calls for cycling to be consider in all planning developments, reflecting not just existing cycle use but the potential for significant increases.

Dave Newton, Director of Transport at Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM) – the Home of British Cycling - said that TfGM had secured £40 million from the Local Sustainable Transport Fund for a cycle commuter project, plus a further £32 from its own sources. This money will be spent on a mix of cycling hubs, improved infrastructure and promotional activity. Newton emphasised the importance of adopting a partnership approach – both between local authorities and with NGOs such as British Cycling, the CTC and Sustrans – to maximise the value of funding.

The London Cycling Campaign’s Tom Bogdanowicz, spoke about the success of their Love London, Go Dutch campaign which British Cycling has supported. The campaign has generated 42,000 signatures so far.

Caroline Pidgeon, whose Transport Committee published a report Gearing Up about the state of cycling in London that British Cycling contributed to, called for more of TfL’s budget to be spent on cycling.

Transport for London talked about the benefits of limiting HGV movements to night hours only. This is already a permanent measure in cities such as Paris and Dublin.

 

The fifth session of the All Party Cycling Group’s Get Britain Cycling inquiry also focused on local authorities and their responsibilities for providing improved road conditions and promoting cycling. Representatives from Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM), Leicester City Council and Devon County Council all gave evidence about their experiences of promoting cycling in their areas. Leicester’s Andy Salkeld was honest about the challenges being faced: “We’ve spent the last 50 years building cities for a car culture. We can’t change that overnight.” TfGM’s Dave Newton agreed “We’re starting from a low point but we are determined to get better.” The Local Government Association agreed that “political will is vital” and added that “every council should have a cycling champion.” The Campaign for the Protection of Rural England said that a major barrier is that the majority of planners “don’t ‘get’ cycling.”

The lessons that can be learned from London were also a focus of today’s session. Transport for London’s Ben Plowden said that “strong leadership, partnership working and sustained investment” is key. The London Cycling Campaign’s Tom Bogdanowicz agreed and said that demand for cycling in London is high – 1 in 4 people want to cycle. Transport for London also talked about the benefits of limiting HGV movements to night hours only throughout London 2012 as a way to reduce the risk of conflicts during rush hour.

Commenting on the session, APPCG Co-Chair Julian Huppert MP, said:

"It was really good to hear today from local campaigners and local authorities - the people who really do the work on the ground. It makes a world of difference if local authorities are backing cycling in their towns and cities. It was also good to hear the Public Health Minister say so clearly that cycling was a healthy thing to do, and that public health benefits from cycling investment. We need joined up thinking at all levels of government if we are to really make progress in promoting cycling. In cities where local authorities are on board, more people are cycling; it’s as simple as that.”

The inquiry provoked a lot of activity on twitter - #getbritaincycling was once again one of the top trending hashtags in the UK.

Representatives from the Local Government Association, Transport for Greater Manchester, Leicester City Council and Devon County Council all gave evidence at today’s inquiry. There was a special focus on lessons learned in London – Transport for London, the London Cycling Campaign and the Borough Cycling Officers’ Group all presented at the inquiry, alongside Caroline Pidgeon MBE – a Chair on the London Assembly Transport Committee. Cyclenation, Cambridge Cycling Campaign and the Campaign to Protect Rural England covered the campaigning perspective and public transport integration was covered by the Association of Train Operating Companies. Health Minister Anna Soubry MP also appeared at the inquiry.

The next session of the Get Britain Cycling inquiry, exploring Leadership from Government will take place on Monday 4th March from 2pm in The Boothroyd Room, Portcullis House. Witnesses include Norman Baker MP, Stephen Hammond MP, Jon Snow and Andrew Gilligan.

For more information about the inquiry, visit: http://allpartycycling.org/inquiry/